Here at Bilegrip (headquarters for the Political Prisoners of the Future), we keep throwing juicy articles on the desk for potential use in this article or that, but they just pile up, never to be used. Unable to grasp a reality wherein our opinions are not awaited breathlessly by everyone (not to mention the potential uselessness of our very existence), I, we, feel you should read these offerings and are thus unable to shitcan them.
Phillip Adams: Terrorism running on fear
After September 11 the world was frozen in terrorism and the manipulation of fear rapidly escalated, eroding America’s civil liberties, adding to presidential power at the cost of Congress, Senate and constitution, justifying a war in Afghanistan and another, now one of the worst fiascos in military and political history, in Iraq. In this pas de deux, Bush and bin Laden pirouette like Torvill and Dean, but the score is a death march, not Ravel’s Bolero. This is symbiosis, a surreal alliance of two religious fundamentalists; of two fools who need each other.
Lionel Shriver: The last refuge of the outrageous
Freedom of speech that does not embrace the right to offend is a farce. The stipulation that you may say whatever you like so long as you don't hurt anyone's feelings canonises the milquetoast homily: "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all." Since rare is the sentiment that doesn't outrage somebody, rest assured that if we enshrine this prissy fortune-cookie aphorism into law, none of us will say anything at all.
I'm sorry, but I'm under no obligation to respect you, or anything you believe. Respect is earned. It is not an entitlement. Since I find evolution credible and well supported by material evidence, I have every reason to regard creationists as delusional crackpots, which would make my at once respecting their beliefs patently absurd. Similarly, in books and articles, I am under no obligation to accord respect to any group, to any ethnicity, community, nation, or religion that hasn't, in my view, earned it.
Tim Flannery: Climate's last chance
By the mid-1970s, the Arctic icecap began melting away at the rate of 8 per cent a decade. This rate of melting persisted almost unchanged until 2004, by which time about one-quarter of the icecap had melted, revealing the dark ocean underneath.
During the summer, the sun falls for 24 hours a day on the Arctic icecap, delivering a huge amount of energy. But ice is bright, and before its melting the Arctic icecap reflected 90 per cent of the sun's energy back into space, keeping the planet cool. But as the ice has melted, more of the sun has fallen on the ocean, and it absorbs 90 per cent of the sun's energy, turning it into heat.
By last year, so much of the sunlight was being captured by the ocean and turned into heat energy that a dramatic change occurred: the ocean stayed so warm that the winter ice did not form properly, and the following summer about 300,000 square kilometres of ice melted. The same thing happened this year, so now huge areas of ocean are exposed where just a few short years ago there was ice.
Before 2004, the rate of melt was such that scientists believed the icecap would melt entirely by about 2100. At the trajectory set by the new rate of melt, however, there will be no Arctic icecap in the next five to 15 years. And with no ice, the Arctic region will rapidly begin heating, perhaps by as much as 12 degrees.
This change will put further pressure on the Greenland icecap, which is already melting at the stupendous rate of 235 cubic kilometres a year. If it succumbs to the heat, the ocean will rise by six metres, and icecaps in the Antarctic may destabilise.
James Hanson, director of NASA's Goddard Institute, is arguably the world authority on climate change. He predicts that we have just a decade to avert a 25-metre rise of the sea. Picture an eight-storey building by a beach, then imagine waves lapping its roof. That's what a 25-metre rise in sea level looks like.
Susan Maushart (a sample from): iAnxiety
Constiplaystation: having abnormally infrequent or painful turns at the video console.
mySpace Cadet: a teenager who spends too much time away with the pixels.
False-Positive Parenting: pretending to hug a child in order to read his Instant Message screen.
Infomaniac: a woman with an uncontrollable urge for text.
iDentity Crisis: when you can’t remember the hint to remember your password.
Michael Leunig: Lest we forget
Now it happens again - the all-powerful Australian swinger-people have changed their minds and are rejecting the war in Iraq. After having endorsed it at the ballot boxes they are now disowning it in the opinion polls.
The shouting and the tumult dies, the captains and the kings depart. Iraq lies mutilated, traumatised and chaotic. Western civilisation has once more created shit and derision in someone else's home. Has something gone wrong or has it all gone as guaranteed in the primal darkness of the great, white Western mind: this racist, relic treasure we're told must be defended?
What has taken the swinging people so long? Could it be that they secretly enjoy a little taste of fresh blood, but when it gets tainted with shit, then they spit it out and go and water the roses?
And where have they gone now - the ones who cheered and promoted this cowardly war: the ones who were never conscripted, the thinkers, writers and commentators - even the odd bishop and cartoonist who rose up to help with the government's dirty, deceitful work - what do these cruel blundering idiots say about this mess and misery which is spreading out of control? Most likely they are working on their exit strategies - fudging, skulking and weaseling their way back to nicey-nicey land.
Guy Rundle: The rat pack is in poll position
One way or another across the English-speaking world we are currently running what are more or less post-democratic societies. British New Labour rules with 36 per cent of the vote, and the support of only 22 per cent of the adult population. The turnout is not apathy about politics, but simple resignation at the uselessness of turning out in a first-past-the-post system when the contending parties are practically identical. Labour has no intention of letting that go, and nor do the Tories, which is why they are reported to have held talks about the possibility of a grand coalition if the next election should give the Liberal Democrats enough seats to hang the parliament. Should that occur, the plan goes, the larger of either Labour or Conservative would govern with the in-principle support of the other party on key issues such as passage of the budget and conduct of war, but without being coalition partners. Both sides will argue that first-past-the-post systems are necessary to have governments that can implement clear initiatives - such as Gordon Brown's recently established commission to find out why people are so disengaged from politics.
Patricia Anderson reviewing Shelly Gare's book, The triumph of the Airheads …
Those MBA and masters degrees that seem to be bestowed like free samples at a cosmetics counter, the erosion of literacy in schools, the disappearance of reasonable manners, the blooming of generic conversational mannerisms lifted from some American sitcom, these are all grist to Gare's mill. In increasingly unrecognisable times, she bemoans a world in which knowledge and common sense are an inconvenience and problems are dismissed by ethical midgets, buffered by more ethical midgets whose heads all nod together around the boardroom table like a field of sunflowers.
There were more, but I couldn't find an internet presence for them. Wait, there is another one. James Ellroy wrote a two page "final autobiographical statement" in the LA Times recently. Each sentence is fired from an AK-47. Here is his brief description of the people who migrated to Los Angeles in the Forties and became the underbelly of the whitebreads and their two-car garages.
James Ellroy: The Great Right Place: James Ellroy comes home
… picaresque grifters, dollar-driven D.A.s, well-hung gigolos, hollow-eyed strumpets, hophead jazz musicians, pervert cops, alcoholic private eyes, sadistic studio heads, laudanum-lapping layabouts, homosexual informants, religious quacks and an uncategorizable array of stupes with indefinable psychopathic mandates and plain inconsolable despair.
-- Olney Garkle
Oh Olney,
Wonderful stuff mate. It brought a smile to me and placed it squarely on my lips. How completely was I wallowing in my own failure for all my wonderful ideas to be picked up and published by anyone else, and clutching out from my lonely world into other's lonely worlds, and I find that I am not alone! Tally Ho old chap. Bring on the beer!
But seriously, what are we to do with all the endless articles, the clippings, and the good thoughts? There are just not enough hours in the day to make good use of all these great ideas, and to bring to everyone's attention those things that rowse us from our slumber.
Speaking of which, there is a parallel between the pieces Anderson, Rundle and Flannery. They all discuss the fact that the ordinary people have become distracted ad nauseum and they are driving the boat that nobody is steering. It's the economy stupid! And the economy is making us stupid! Fuck!
Posted by Nahum Ayliffe on December 16, 2006
Nahum,
That just about covers it, mate. And wraps it as well. In the face of eternity, as they say, we are just whistling in the wind. I'm convinced that I'm wasting my time, but have chosen to do this as opposed to wasting my time at some other endeavour. And then you die. The point being, I guess, that until I choose to enroll in "What the fuck is really going on 101" then it'll all end in tears, screams, and finally, corpse gas.
PS: This blue colour is far too hard on the eyes. I'll change it soon.
Posted by Olney Garkle on December 16, 2006